Frontpage Book 1: THE EXPERIENCER (free) Book 2: THE MECHANISM (free) Videos Podcasts FAQ

98. A bridge between science and phenomenology

The deepest gulf in modern science is not between the disciplines. It is the gulf between objective outer reality and subjective inner experience. Science has for over three hundred years attempted to explain the one in terms of the other — and failed. Consciousness remains unexplained. Qualia remains unexplained. The observer’s role remains unexplained.

In the EC/HE theory the gulf is not a problem awaiting solution. It is an artefact of a mistaken ontology.

The Experience Circle is the mirroring mechanism that connects objective structure and subjective experience. On one side of the horizon: relational structures in KNOWING — what science describes as objective physical reality. On the other side: qualia, meaning and experience — what phenomenology describes from the inside. The EC is the mechanism that translates between them. It is not the bridge between two separate worlds. It is the demonstration that there were never two worlds — only two sides of one and the same relational event.

Qualia, observation, meaning and experience thus enter into the same ontological framework as physics, psychology, mathematics and cosmology. Phenomenology and science do not describe different realities. They describe the same structure seen from each side of the horizon.

This opens up a new scientific landscape in which experience can again be examined without falling back into superstition or purely subjective interpretations. Phenomenology, introspection, consciousness research and qualia can be treated as legitimate fields of observation on a par with other forms of observation — not because the demands for logic and precision are lowered, but because experience is recognised as a real part of reality that must be included in the understanding of what the universe is.

Science has followed manifestation all the way to the horizon. Phenomenology has described experience from the inside of the same horizon. What remains is to recognise that they have always been describing the same thing — from each their side.