Frontpage Summary Full text (free) Audiobook (free) Buy the book Videos Podcasts FAQ
Here is the Facebook post where you can read any comments – and comment yourself!
–-
Over the past few days, we have moved from imagination and attractors, through emergence and collapse, to humanity’s enduring attempt to rethink how we can live together.
Today, we will make this concrete.
If large, centralized structures lose their carrying capacity – what is the natural unit that can sustain a society?
History and experience point in one direction: small, transparent, relational units.
Not isolated individuals.
Not gigantic systems.
But cells.
A cell is not an ideology.
It is a functional scale.
It already exists in nature. In biology. In ecology. In organisms. In the nervous system. In the earliest forms of society. It is the smallest unit capable of being self-regulating, self-correcting, and relational at the same time.
The same applies to human beings.
We function best in groups small enough that we:
– know each other
– sense each other’s needs
– share responsibility
– experience reciprocity
– resolve conflicts without bureaucracy
When groups become too large, something predictable happens:
Responsibility becomes abstract.
Relationships weaken.
Rules replace trust.
Control replaces closeness.
This does not mean that large structures are always wrong. But they cannot be the primary carriers of life. They must be support structures.
Cells are the opposite of mass.
In a cell, people are not interchangeable. They are necessary. One cannot hide in anonymity. One cannot outsource all responsibility. At the same time, one is not alone.
This is why many modern people experience both loneliness and powerlessness at the same time: they live in systems that are too large to be intimate and too complex to be influenced.
Cell-based organization is not a romantic return to the past. It is a structural adaptation to human cognitive and relational capacity.
Research on groups, networks, and cooperation repeatedly shows that trust and coordination function best within limited sizes. When relationships become too numerous to be directly experienced, they are replaced by systems.
Systems are necessary.
But they are secondary.
A cell can be:
– a local community
– a work collective
– a co-housing group
– a neighborhood sharing resources
– a self-organized group with shared responsibility
The decisive factor is not the form, but the principle:
Transparency.
Reciprocity.
Limited size.
Genuine participation.
This does not mean that the world should fragment into isolated islands. Cells can connect in networks. Regions can cooperate. Technology can support coordination. But foundational stability must remain at the relational scale.
Large systems without living cells beneath them become fragile.
When we see the emergence of cooperatives, eco-villages, sharing models, local food systems, small production communities, and self-organized networks, these are not random subcultures.
They are attempts to establish new attractors at a more sustainable level.
Interestingly, this movement often begins internally. When people free themselves from the belief that security exists only within large institutions, they begin experimenting with smaller, more relational structures.
This does not mean everything must be torn down.
It means sustainability is not primarily a technical question. It is a structural one.
A balanced society must have:
– small units that carry life
– intermediate levels that coordinate
– larger structures that protect and support
When the foundational levels weaken, the top becomes heavy and unstable.
Cell-based societies are therefore not a dream of perfection. They are a recalibration of scale.
They bring organization back within what humans can directly experience and manage.
Size and structure alone are not enough to create functioning cells. The decisive factor is resonance.
A cell works not because everyone agrees on everything, but because people recognize one another in tempo, values, emotional style, work rhythm, and fundamental life orientation.
Resonance means that people:
– understand each other’s signals without constant explanation
– tolerate differences because they share a common rhythm
– experience interaction as energizing
– recognize what is essential in one another
This is not surface similarity, but deep compatibility.
Without resonance, enormous energy is spent on misunderstandings, defense, and control. With resonance, energy is used for creation.
Cells cannot be mechanically constructed. They must grow through recognition.
People find one another.
They sense who they flow with.
Who it is easy to be honest with.
Whom collaboration feels natural with.
This is field-based.
Equally important is resonance between cells. Cells must form networks with complementary functions: food, care, learning, production, communication, coordination.
When cells resonate with one another, resources flow more easily, trust grows, and the need for top-down control diminishes.
Resonance does not arise from plans, but from practice:
– shared tasks
– shared responsibility
– ongoing adjustment
– honesty about friction
– natural selection
Some constellations work. Others do not. That is learning.
Over time, the most resonant patterns stabilize and become new attractors.
A living society does not consist of identical units, but of harmonized differences.
Human beings have limited capacity to maintain living relationships simultaneously.
Experience suggests the following ranges:
– Core group: approx. 5–12 people
– Everyday community: approx. 15–40 people
– Extended cell: approx. 40–120 people
Within these ranges, direct communication, responsibility, emotional resonance, and trust can be maintained.
When groups grow far beyond this, subgroups, hierarchies, and indirect relationships emerge.
Therefore, larger communities must be built as networks of cells, not as a single mass.
A sustainable society resembles living tissue:
Small units at the base.
Flexibly connected.
With temporary coordination layers.
Scale is created through connection, not accumulation.
In a transitional era where large systems lose strength, such cells will become increasingly important. Not as ideologies, but as practical solutions.
This is not an escape from the world.
It is a transformation of it.
Question:
Is there a community in your life that already functions as such a cell – or could it, if it gained more awareness and shared responsibility?
–-
All posts are collected continuously here:
There you can also see what is coming next.