Behind humanity’s many religious languages, symbols and spiritual traditions there exists a pervasive representation of a larger holistic structure from which manifest reality springs. This core is described again and again under different names, in different places, at different times — but points towards the same fundamental experience: that all manifest experience has its origin in a larger relational field of order, meaning and coherence.

In the EC/HE theory this totality is designated as KNOWING — the total abstract and relational structure that underlies all manifest experience through the Experience Circle and the Horizon Equation.

Hinduism’s Akasha and Brahman, Christian mysticism’s Logos and Christ Consciousness, Taoism’s Tao, Sufism’s divine unity, modern consciousness research’s collective field — all point towards different descriptions of the same underlying whole. The differences between the traditions lie primarily in language, culture, symbols and historical context, not in the experiential core they attempt to describe.

This is why people from very different traditions describe remarkably similar experiences when they move past the most rigid ego and cultural structures: experiences of unity, boundless love, stillness, clarity, truth and direct contact with something greater than the local identity. These are not coincidental similarities. It is the same landscape, described from different entry points.

KNOWING therefore does not represent merely information or abstract knowledge, but the total relational whole from which all local perspectives spring and within which they are continuously reorganised. It is what has always been there — beneath the representations, beneath the language, beneath the ego-tree’s dominance.

Throughout history human beings have intuitively experienced this whole, but lacked a precise language for describing the mechanisms behind the experience. The result has been symbolic and spiritual descriptions of great beauty and depth — pointing towards the same core without being able to explain it structurally.

The EC/HE theory attempts to build a bridge between these ancient experiences and an explicit ontological language. Not to replace the traditions’ wisdom, but to show that what they point towards is real — and that it can now be described with a precision that was not previously available.

« Previous Next »