125. BEING as a permanent state
This leads back to the theory’s most fundamental ontological premise: BEING is.
Non-BEING is logically impossible. Every denial of existence already presupposes existence. Even the conception of absolute nothingness must exist as experience or understanding in order to be thought at all. BEING can never be fully annulled — not because it is strong or protected, but because the very annulment already presupposes it.
BEING does not represent merely something that exists, but existence itself as such — the ontological foundation that makes experience, observation, differentiation and manifestation possible. The word simultaneously expresses both state and action: that which IS, and that which experiences that it IS.
One cannot go further inward than BEING. Every attempt to seek a deeper foundation collapses back into the same necessity: that something must be.
Even if all relations were to collapse back towards VOID — towards complete homogeneity and absence of differentiation — BEING would still persist. THE EXPERIENCER cannot cease, because the very cessation already presupposes existence as the ground of possibility. VOID is not nothing. It is the state in which BEING finds itself before new differentiation — not the absence of BEING, but its resting pulse.
The consequence is unavoidable: complete permanent stillness is impossible. As long as BEING is, the necessity for new sensation, new differentiation and new emergence exists. The universe cannot be concluded absolutely. Existence is not something that happens once — it is what is always already happening, and which cannot but continue.
