Frontpage Summary Full text (free) Audiobook (free) Buy the book Videos Podcasts FAQ
Here is the FB post where you can see any comments – and comment yourself!
–-
After periods of collapse, people throughout history have asked the same question:
If the old system no longer works – how can we live together in a better way?
This question is not new.
It has followed humanity throughout history.
When major social structures lose their power, a wave of new ideas almost always emerges about how society could be organized differently. Not as finished plans, but as mental experiments.
What we today often call “utopias” are such attempts.
To many, the word utopia sounds naïve. Like wishful thinking. Like daydreaming. But historically, utopian models have rarely been an escape from reality. They have been responses to crises.
Already in Plato, we find attempts to describe how a society could be organized around knowledge, responsibility, and justice, in a time marked by political instability and power struggles.
In the 16th century, Thomas More wrote his Utopia, in the midst of economic turmoil, poverty, concentration of power, and social disintegration in Europe. The text was not a dream of perfection, but an indirect analysis of which structures no longer worked.
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, new models emerged among thinkers such as Charles Fourier and Tommaso Campanella, who described small, self-organizing, and knowledge-based communities.
In Russia, Alexander Bogdanov developed visions of a collectively organized society based on science, cooperation, and organizational theory.
Across time and cultures, we see the same pattern: When old structures collapse, people begin to experiment mentally before they do so in practice.
These texts are not definitive answers. They are mirrors.
They show which problems were unsolvable within the old system, and which new structures people began to glimpse.
Utopia is therefore not primarily an image of the perfect society.
It is a tool for thinking beyond the framework of collapse.
It is also important to see the danger here.
When people try to turn a utopia into a fixed blueprint – an ideology to be implemented at all costs – it has often ended in coercion and oppression. History shows that “perfect societies” become destructive when they are frozen.
Living societies cannot be fully designed in advance. They must be able to change.
The most fertile utopias have therefore never been detailed construction plans. They have been open models that point to principles:
These are the structural questions these models have always tried to answer.
The Inner Perspective
At the same time, it is crucial to understand that this search for new forms of society does not primarily begin “out there,” in organization and institutions. It begins in people’s inner mental frameworks.
Before new ways of living together can emerge, old ways of thinking must begin to loosen their grip.
We are all shaped by traditions, norms, expectations, and systems we grew up in. Ideas about what is possible. What is realistic. Who we must be. What gives value. What provides security. Much of this is taken for granted, without ever having been consciously chosen.
When such inner patterns begin to lose their power, it can feel unsettling. One loses old reference points. Old identities. Old explanations. But it is precisely in this space that something new can grow.
As Bob Marley sings: “Only ourselves can free our minds.”
Freedom begins with how we understand ourselves and the world.
When the ego’s defense structures, old self-images, and rigid assumptions weaken, a more open and coherent way of seeing often emerges. One begins to notice relationships, patterns, and wholes that were previously invisible. One becomes less governed by fear and more by insight.
In this context, this is what we can call spiritual awakening: not as something supernatural, but as an expansion of understanding that arises out of necessity. A necessary reorganization of meaning when old mental structures no longer work.
It is not about “becoming something else.” It is about seeing more clearly.
Inner and Outer Are Connected
When many people undergo such inner shifts simultaneously, it also affects how societies organize themselves. New values become important. New forms of cooperation become possible. New priorities gain space.
Outer changes follow inner ones.
This is why spirituality and science are connected here. Both attempt, in different ways, to understand how experience, consciousness, and structure develop – both in individuals and in communities.
When we today see renewed interest in alternative living arrangements, cooperatives, eco-villages, sharing models, new forms of work, and local communities, it is not random.
It is the same pattern returning.
Old systems lose power. New ideas begin to circulate.
We are entering a new phase of mental prototyping.
Not because anyone has found “the right solution,” but because experience is forcing the need for new forms.
From this perspective, today’s experiments are not marginal. They are forerunners. They are places where new attractors are tested in practice.
This points directly toward what we will discuss on Day 8: cell-based societies.
Not as utopias. But as concrete, flexible units that can function in a world where large, centralized structures are losing their capacity to endure.
Question:
Have you noticed new ways of living, working, or collaborating around you that were uncommon ten to fifteen years ago?
–-
All posts are continuously collected here:
There you can also see what is coming next.